Skip to main content

Independent automation QA

Find out if your automation will hold up before it costs you a customer.

We independently review n8n, Make, Zapier, Power Automate and AI workflows for the failures a green “success” status hides, and tell you in plain English what to fix.

Priced to fit your workflow. Call (904) 605-8206 or book a call for a quote.

Bulletproof Automation QABulletproof Automation QA
Sample

QA Snapshot

Lead Routing Workflow

n8n · v2.4 · 12 findings

62/100

Verdict

Not Production-Ready

  • ReliabilityGaps
  • Failure handlingFail
  • Data integrityGaps
  • Operational readinessFail
  • Evidence & reportingPass

Top findings

  • CriticalAI step accepts unvalidated payload

    Malformed input is forwarded to the CRM without a schema check.

  • HighNo error workflow on the HTTP node

    Failed runs report success; nobody is alerted.

  • MediumProduction credentials reused in staging

    Live customer data is reachable from a test environment.

Sample QA Snapshot report for an illustrative lead routing workflow.

Page one of a sample QA Snapshot. See the full sample

Founder-led by Johnathan Lightfoot

  • 30+ years in IT
  • 3× Microsoft Press author
  • n8n Ambassador
  • U.S. Navy veteran

The hidden risk

A workflow can run successfully and still fail your business.

Most automation failures aren't broken nodes. They're missing validation, duplicate processing, bad AI output, weak logging and nobody owning the failure path. All of it can sit behind a green checkmark.

Reminders sent on schedule

Nothing stopped the same customer getting duplicate payment reminders, and there were few checks before live sends.

Backups completed successfully

Little evidence a restore would actually work when the business needed it.

Every lead routed

Unvalidated AI output written straight into the CRM, with no alert when it failed.

Start here

The QA Snapshot: an independent review of one workflow.

A fixed-scope review that tells you whether the workflow is ready, what could go wrong, and what to do about it.

  • A plain-English verdict: ready, ready with conditions, or not ready
  • Severity-ranked findings with the business impact of each
  • Failure points, missing safeguards and data risks
  • A short, prioritised list of what to fix first

Priced to fit your workflow. Call (904) 605-8206 or book a call for a quote.

How it works

  1. 1

    Send us the workflow

    An export or screenshots, plus what it does and what breaks if it fails.

  2. 2

    We review it independently

    Against five domains: reliability, failure handling, data integrity, operational readiness and evidence.

  3. 3

    You get a verdict and a fix list

    Plain English, ranked by severity, ready to act on or hand to your builder.

Recent client work

What real reviews turned up.

Paid engagements, anonymised at the client's request.

All proof of work

Paid Confidential Client Engagement

Backup Reliability QA Review

A backup automation the business was relying on to protect critical data.

What we found

  • Weak recovery confidence
  • Potential failure points under real-world use
  • Limited operational safeguards

The review helped clarify whether the workflow was ready for serious operational use and identified areas that needed improvement before the automation could be trusted in a business-critical environment.

Paid Confidential Client Engagement

Invoice Reminder Workflow QA Review

An automation sending invoice reminders to real customers from Gmail and Google Sheets.

What we found

  • Duplicate reminder risk
  • Data mismatch risk between Gmail and Sheets
  • Financial communication sensitivity

The review helped identify the safeguards needed before relying on the workflow for real financial reminders and customer communication.

Johnathan Lightfoot, founder of Bulletproof Automation QA

Who reviews your workflow

Johnathan Lightfoot, founder

I've spent more than 30 years in IT: leading software development teams, writing three books for Microsoft Press, teaching at Howard Community College, and serving in the U.S. Navy. Today I'm also an n8n Ambassador.

I started Bulletproof Automation QA to give business owners and builders an honest, independent answer to one question: will this automation hold up?

Questions

Before you send us anything.

Something else? Ask us directly.

What do I need to send you?

The workflow export (JSON) or screenshots, and a few sentences on what it does and what happens if it fails. Documentation, logs or a demo video help, but you don't need them to start.

Is my workflow and data safe with you?

A Snapshot is a static review: we don't run your workflow or connect to your systems unless we agree to add testing. Please remove passwords and API keys before sending anything. Your details are kept confidential.

What if the review finds nothing wrong?

Then you get that in writing: an independent verdict you can show a client, a buyer or your own team.

Do you fix the problems you find?

Every report includes a prioritised list of what to fix and how. Our Production Readiness Review adds a remediation roadmap and retesting once the fixes are in.

Does QA guarantee the automation will never fail?

No. QA reduces risk by finding hidden failure points, weak controls and operational gaps before they cause damage. No honest reviewer can promise zero failures.

Which platforms do you review?

n8n, Make, Zapier, Power Automate, Airtable, Pipedream, Retool, Bubble, AI agents and Custom APIs, among others. If it's an automation, we can review it.

Before your business depends on it, find out if it holds up.

Send us one workflow and get an independent verdict. Not sure what it will cost? Call (904) 605-8206 for a quote.

Build automations yourself? Practical workshops on pricing, testing and delivering workflows that survive real clients.

Bulletproof Training
CallRequest a QA Snapshot